logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2013.04.09 2013고단169
특수절도등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 27, 2013, at around 02:00 to 03:00, the Defendants discovered a large-scale flusium flusium in an amount equivalent to KRW 2,100,000 in the market price owned by the victim G, which was parked in the F apartment parking lot in Chungcheongnam-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, the Defendants: (a) reported the network in the surrounding areas; and (b) Defendant A took advantage of the name “marik” prepared in advance; and (c) took advantage of the name “marik”, the Defendants took the flusium in a way that the Defendants embark together with others.

2. The Defendants were aware of the method of committing a crime by destroying the taxi glass and taking things through the Internet news, etc., and were able to commit a crime against the empty taxi using the same method by preparing for the commission of the crime, such as wallets, caps, military mars, and aftermash.

On February 13, 2013, at around 02:00 to 03:00, the Defendants discovered J-si’s private taxi owned by the victim I who was parked there on the road front of the H-gun of Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, and Defendant B was able to get off and walk off the leba, and Defendant A was able to put the military check prepared in advance between the window glass and door of the taxi and cut off the window in the future, using the lebroto principle, and then cut the window into the taxi, and then cut down the cash amounting to 30,000 won in cash in that taxi, as shown in the attached list of crimes in the attached Table, from the above date to March 3, 2013, the Defendants stolen the total amount of KRW 1,19,089,000 in total on 27 occasions, including Chungcheong-si, Hongsung-gun, and the budget group.

As a result, the defendants committed a theft of the victims' property or did not have any property to be stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement prepared by the K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, M, U, V, X, Y, I, Z, AA, AB, AC, AE, AE, AF, G, AH, AI, and AJ;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Defendants of pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (a) and Articles 342 and 331 of the Criminal Act.

arrow