Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on November 18, 2006 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 1 million at the Sungnam support of Suwon Friwon on January 19, 2007), driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on September 30, 2017 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 2 million at the Suwon District Court on October 25, 2017), and violating Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.

On July 29, 2018, the Defendant driven B QM5 car under the influence of alcohol content of about 200 meters from around 200 meters to around 0.118% while under the influence of alcohol content from around 200 meters to around 0.118%, in the direction of apartment road, from the front of alley-nam Eup's administrative Ri in the native-nam Eup in the direction of Hasungsung.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Records of judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (Attachment to a copy of the previous summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of the crime of this case is that the Defendant, who had been able to drive a second alcohol not less than twice, has driven a second alcohol, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime. The Defendant, who was discovered by the driving of a second alcohol in September 2017 and was again driving of the second alcohol in this case for not less than one year after he was found to have driven a second alcohol, has a lot of possibility of criticism.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, and the defendant was punished for a fine by being discovered twice due to drinking driving. However, the detection of the defendant's drinking driving force in around 2006 has passed since 11 years or more from the date of the crime of this case, and other age, sex, environment, motive, means, and result of the crime of this case.