A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

Around November 2010, the Defendant came to know of the Victim H through the introduction of G, and developed a patent at the office of Pyeongtaek-dong, Cheongdong, with Lisung Electronic I. This project was completed, and the patent right in Lidong is expected to be paid KRW 6 billion under the condition that the patent right in L Ligu is exceeded in the Kigu, the Bank of Korea will purchase J in an amount equivalent to one billion won and proceed with the business with another patent right related to transportation facilities with the remainder of the funds. If the business related to the patent of the transportation facilities is conducted, the parts of Ligu, which are “the use of the Samsung Electronic Parts,” were believed to be believed to be the above victim.

However, the defendant did not have any business relation with the KCAB at the time, and even if he borrowed money because there was no property which had been repeated business failure, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.

1. On March 25, 2011, the fraud Defendant sent the same attitude that the said victim would be paid in full by sending a telephone to the said victim at the place of payment, and that “A loan of KRW 1.5 million shall be paid in the amount of the loan to the three accounts in the name of G in the name of the said victim and received KRW 1.5 million from the said victim, from that time until October 8 of the same year, from that time, the Defendant received and received KRW 37,200,000 in total over six times, as shown in the list of crimes, from that time.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the above victim and 37,200,000 won in total as the borrowed money over six times in total.

2. When the Defendant received a continuous demand for the borrowed money from H as set forth in the above 1.3, he had the intention to forge a disbursement resolution in the name of the Samsung Electronic Patent Team, which would be deemed to be an hour.

On September 6, 2011, the Defendant, at a lifelong learning hall located in Gyeonggi-si, was stored in his/her work using his/her computer, in the form of electronic decision-making.