logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.10.23 2018가단50824
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On August 3, 2014, the Plaintiff agreed to conduct the same business with the Defendant, who had been engaged in the lease business with the trade name C, and prepared each of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant documents”) with the Defendant. On September 3, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant received authentication as a notary public office of Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office No. 13240, which belongs to the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office, as to each of the instant documents.

(hereinafter referred to as “C”, telephone number E, and F of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s above-mentioned business contract are to provide the Defendant with KRW 10,000,00 and to share the trade name and telephone number equally. (The above trade name and telephone number may not be changed without consultation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

3) If, in any case in any case in the area in C, in any case in which they are located, they will not be engaged in the business and the lease business in the area of the mountain, the area of the mountain, the area of the mountain, the area of the mountain and the area of the mountain and the area of the area in which they are located, and if they were damaged by the business and the lease in C, the amount of 50,000,000 won shall be paid to those who remain in C as a business compensation. (It

2) Of the Plaintiff and Defendant 2, KRW 10,00,000 in the case of G from the Plaintiff and Defendant 2 may be transferred and sold to the third person, and the remaining persons shall be paid to those who have left in the case of refusal of the third person’s body: Provided, That in the case of the third person’s selection, the third person has the next license and work experience (the same shall apply to those who have carried on business).

'The partnership agreement of this case'

(2) On October 31, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) leased the underground office of the G building in the G building in the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the Republic of Korea; and (b) from around that time, the Plaintiff and the Defendant engaged in the tea rental business with the trade name of the G building C as well. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the overall purport of the pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the judgment of the Plaintiff without the Defendant on January 3, 2018, prepared a work log forming the basis for profit distribution, and the Defendant was dissatisfied with the method for preparing the work log.

arrow