logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.06.05 2013고합33
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was a well-knownr of the “E” located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

The Defendant, from October 2008, stated “G” as the facts charged in the facts charged in Y in Yannam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, but comprehensively taking account of the evidence, corrected it as it appears “F”’s clerical error.

While carrying out construction to build a three story religious facility (a building for the establishment of a three story charnel house) on land, the facts charged in the charge of the victim, who is a specialized constructor at the construction site around March 16, 2010, is indicated as the victim. However, considering that the complainant of the crime of this case is H stock company and the party who entered into the construction contract with the Defendant was a H stock company, the victim was corrected as H stock company.

The representative director I of H Co., Ltd. stated that “B is currently running a charnel construction, I obtained permission from the inspection. At the same time, the existing construction business operator suspended the construction for the extent of 1/3, and completed the construction, and then, the construction cost will be changed to 2.5 billion won (1 billion won for each letter of August 4, 201) later. However, there is no money at present, and the construction work will be conducted on credit, once again. In the last time, the building is completed, and a charnel report is filed, which will lead to profits from the sale of a charnel, and the construction cost may be paid fully to the person who is due to the revenue.”

Therefore, the Defendant has a duty to notify whether the victims have sold a charnel house and a charnel house that can be sold in lots in relation to the method of payment, which is the most important factor in the process of the construction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant sold the Defendant’s creditors J 1,00, K 1,000, and L 160 total amount of 2,160 pieces of 1,000,000 pieces of 1,000 pieces of 1,000 pieces of n, N, and P after commencement of the construction. Since the commencement of the construction, the Defendant sold M 1,00 pieces of 1,00 pieces of n, 1,000 pieces of n, and n.

arrow