A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “F” in the name of “F” in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Center 107 at D Building E Center 107, has deteriorated the operation of the above Institute due to the delay in paying monthly wages and material costs of the above English Institute. As such, the Defendant, in collusion with the Defendant’s husband G, was willing to receive investment funds from investors by receiving the franchise business of the Institute from investors.

On June 7, 2011, the Defendant: “Around the end of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H coffee shop, the Defendant is scheduled to start the Victim C with the English Private Teaching Institutes for the young children who are in Korea F, and to begin the franchise of the English Private Teaching Institutes. If the Defendant invested KRW 100 million in order to expand and transfer the principal of the said private teaching institute, he/she shall pay the profits of KRW 300,000 per month and return the principal after one year. G is a director of the I created for the said franchise business.” From the victim on July 7, 2011, the Defendant was transferred from the victim KRW 20,000 to the agricultural bank account in the name of his/her husband, and around July 8, 2011, KRW 80 million to the said account as a loan, respectively.

However, the Defendant was liable to pay KRW 00 million from J, K, etc. due to financial difficulties at the time. Moreover, since the operation of the FF Institute was in a state of being pushed down, the Defendant had no intention or ability to transfer or franchise business by expanding the principal source of the said F Institute even if he received the said money from the victim.

As a result, the defendant was given money by deceiving the victim in collusion with G.

The defendant of "2012 Highest 1016" is a person who has operated a F Childcare Center in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City L.

1. On March 201, 201, the Defendant against the victim M was refused to pay 36 million won to the victim M, who is the parents of the above child care center, in lump sum payment of 36 million won to the victim M, who was the parents of the above child care center. However, the Defendant again requested the victim to pay 30 million won for one year.