A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 도로교통법위반(음주측정거부) 피고인은 2014. 7. 18. 23:44경부터 다음 날 00:14경까지 사이에 광주시 B에 있는 경기광주경찰서 C지구대에서, 위 지구대 소속 경찰공무원 경장 D으로부터 피고인의 입에서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴색이 붉은 등 피고인이 음주운전을 하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 5회에 걸쳐 음주측정 요구를 받고도, 음주측정기에 입을 댄 후 헛바람을 불면서 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피함으로써 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

2. At around 00:04 on July 19, 2014, the Defendant refused a police officer’s request to take a drinking test at several times from police officers D (years 32) at the foregoing place, and obstructed a police officer’s legitimate performance of duty on a drinking measurement by making one-time drinking of the victim’s right arms and clothes, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning D, E, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (e.g., details of refusal of measurement);

1. Relevant statutory provisions of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2(1)2 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime, the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488, Apr. 1, 2009) (see, 2009Da11448, Jan. 2, 201

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;