A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around July 22:15, 2015, the Defendant illegally uses a car: (a) in E-cafeteria operated by the victim D, the Defendant: (b) was driving the said cargo vehicle at a section of approximately 1 km from the part of the said 1km to the front of the said cafeteria via approximately 205 km, which brought the victim’s Fwing-31 ton of the cargo vehicle owned by the victim, without the victim’s consent; (c) was parked in front of the said cafeteria; and (d) was driving the said cargo vehicle at a section of approximately 1km to the front of the said cafeteria via a 3rd apartment in the same Gun.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc.) were engaged in driving of the said cargo while temporarily

On July 7, 2015, at around 22:20, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol of 0.212% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.20%, and led to the operation of the above cargo to the f1st stadium of the 3th apartment 205 front of the 3th apartment 205 East-gu, Youngnam-gun.

At this point, traffic signal lights are installed, leading to a three-distance intersection in which traffic control is performed, so the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely operate the steering gear and brakes by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was without looking at the front line while under the influence of alcohol, and tried to find and operate a H-learning car of the victim G (the age of 26) who was in the front line of the Defendant at the Defendant’s front line. However, due to the negligence that was caused by bracing from bracs and failed to conduct the operation, the back part of the flacing car was shocked by the part of the Defendant’s cargo driver’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.