The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is true and the defendant is informed for the benefit of the occupants of the apartment and thus the illegality is excluded in accordance with Article 310 of the Criminal Act.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby finding the Defendant guilty.

2. Although the Defendant alleged to the same effect in the lower court, the lower court also focused on the fact that the details of the Defendant’s entries in the inducement are false and criticize the victim by taking account of the victim’s investigative agency and the legal statement of the lower court, the background leading up to the Defendant’s posting

On the other hand, the defendant's argument is rejected and the facts charged are convicted.

Examining the above judgment of the court below closely by comparing it with the records, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the establishment of an offense of defamation or by misapprehending the legal principles.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.