Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an operator of a sexual traffic business establishment in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government No. 1808, and Defendant B is an employee of a sexual traffic business establishment in question.

1. The Defendant: (a) around August 21, 2014, at the foregoing commercial entertainment business establishment around 21:00, the Defendant: (b) reported commercial sex acts posted on the Internet website by the Defendant; (c) received KRW 100,000 in cash from the customer F, and had female employees B do the act of similarity, such as causing the customer’s sexual organ to be scam and scam and scam, and causing them to scam, after going through the room; and (d) operated commercial sex acts during the period from August 18, 2014 to August 21, 2014.

2. Defendant B

A. From August 21, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic) around 21:00, the Defendant engaged in sexual traffic by receiving KRW 60,000,00 of the sexual traffic price of KRW 100,000,000 from the above D D Building No. 180, and by using his/her hand and with his/her hand to scam the sexual organ of the customer F, thereby doing the act

B. On August 21, 2014, around 22:00, the Defendant committed the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties. Around August 21, 2014, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance, such as: (a) the horse captain of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station G G G, G, the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, hiding the Defendant who hidden the handbag; (b) the Defendant’s handbag that she saws the Defendant to show the handbag; and (c) the Defendant her left hand with the handbag; (d) the Defendant was able to escape the disturbance.

Accordingly, H et al. arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, thereby obstructing the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on the crime of police officials walking the sexual flag part of H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Application of field photographs, evidence and photographs of the obstruction of performance of official duties to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

B. Defendant B: The obstruction of the performance of official duties under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act.