The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

(b) even if the origin is not confused, if there is a concern for confusion as to the origin of the good from the perspective of ordinary consumers, such as that it might cause confusion as to the origin of the good due to the product’s mark attached to the good by the third party, etc., by taking over the good from the purchaser or selling the goods using the product’s mark, Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act.

The term "an act that causes confusion with another person's goods" under the following items.

원심과 환송 전 당심이 적법하게 채택조사한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인이 판매한 이 사건 모조품 가방에는 피해자 C의 상품표지 “”와 거의 동일한 표장이 부착되어 있는 점, 피해자도 위와 같은 상품표지를 가방이나 핸드백 등에 사용하여 온 점, 피고인 스스로 그의 인터넷 쇼핑몰에 “이번에 야심차게 준비한 신상 비비안웨스트우* 디자인의 숄더백이야”라고 상품 설명을 기재하는 등 피고인도 이 사건 모조품 가방이 피해자 상품의 모조품임을 알고 있었던 점 등을 인정할 수 있다.

Examining these circumstances in light of the above legal principles, even if there is no possibility that the buyers who purchased the goods of this case from the Defendant might confuse their source, the goods of this case may be taken over from the purchaser, or the third party who purchased the goods of this case might confuse their source from the perspective of general consumers, such as the possibility of confusion about its source. Thus, Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act to sell the goods of this case.

"Act that causes confusion with another person's goods" as referred to in the following items:

Ultimately, Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (hereinafter "the Unfair Competition Prevention Act") provides that the defendant's act of selling the reproduction of the

set forth in the following items: