logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고정698
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, before the Victim C’s house located in Jeju-si, the Defendant: (b) reported that the Defendant’s husband D entered the Victim’s house; (c) discovered the Defendant’s appearance; and (d) f, a friendly E, a ductal son F, together with F, her native her native son, ske the said Victim’s house gate; and (d) her initial race, and infringed upon the Victim’s house by jointly entering the Defendant’s house through an open gate to which D does not go.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Suspension of sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act [The suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant is guilty of a crime and reflects the fact that the husband has drinking with another woman at the latest time, and the husband has taken into account the motive, circumstances, etc. of the crime, such as the occurrence of a part of the case, such as the victim and the husband's attempted, etc.; the defendant is in a divorce lawsuit against her husband; the victim is in a lawsuit against her husband; the victim cannot be deemed to have suffered special damage in this case; considering the character, character, environment, occupation, etc. of the defendant, the defendant is judged to be remarkably normal to not repeat the crime and to not repeat the crime in the future] [The suspended sentence: Fines 500,00 won per day: 10,000 won per day] or more.

arrow