All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of fraud among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of evidence judgment and the legal doctrine on

In addition, the argument that the prosecution procedure is invalid against the warrant requirement or due process principle is not a legitimate ground for appeal after the deadline for submitting the grounds for appeal has lapsed.

Therefore, there is no error of law such as omission of judgment in the lower court’s measures, which did not relate to the above assertion as the object of trial.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the records, the lower court is justifiable to have rendered a not-guilty verdict on the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal,

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.