logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.06 2017나2029093
손해배상(기)등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for this case are that the court of first instance sees this case based on the table (No. 1-02), [No. 11-04] and [No. 11-05] and [No. 11-06] of the judgment of the court of first instance sees this case as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception that the parts of the public 11-06] are as follows. The defendants' assertion [No. 11-02] of the judgment of the court of first instance sees that there is no procedure omitted in the Arabic waterproof process on the rooftop floor of the apartment complex of this case. However, it is reasonable to distinguish the difference between the difference between the cost of construction and the cost of construction and the cost of construction and the cost of construction and the cost of construction and other cost of construction and other cost of construction from the difference of the cost of construction and other cost of construction and other cost of construction and other cost of construction and other cost of construction and other cost of construction and other cost of construction from the difference of 4.6.

arrow