1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

1. Basic facts

A. On April 20, 2016, the Plaintiff, as the owner of the real estate listed in the attached list, a public rental apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”), determined and leased the instant apartment as KRW 20,980,00 and monthly rent of KRW 650,380 to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease contract”), and around that time, delivered the instant apartment to the Defendant.

B. The content of the instant lease agreement pertaining to the instant case is as follows.

Article 10 (Cancellation and Termination of Lease Contracts) (1) Where a lessee commits any of the following acts, a lessor may cancel or terminate this contract, or refuse to renew the lease contract:

2. Where he transfers the right of lease of a rental house to another person or subleases such rental house in violation of Article 19 of the Rental Housing Act.

C. On July 24, 2017, the Plaintiff sent an official door to the effect that the instant lease contract should not be terminated on the grounds that the Plaintiff violated the obligation to sublease the instant apartment to the Defendant, and the said official door reached the Defendant around that time.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 5, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 4 (including each number), and Eul evidence Nos. 3 through 5 as to the cause of the claim, Eul completed the move-in report on the apartment of this case as the defendant's relative of each of the defendant on August 21, 2015, and C on July 15, 2016, and D completed the move-in registration as the defendant's relative of the Eth day, and the plaintiff's employee took a fact-finding survey on October 15, 2016 to verify whether the defendant actually resided in the apartment of this case, the defendant mistakenly stated the above B, Eul's name as F and G in the occupant's column, the vehicle of this case was registered as a resident's vehicle in the apartment management office of this case, and the plaintiff vindicates the defendant about the violation of the re-lease restriction on rental housing.