beta
Text
1. Defendant . Of the distribution schedule prepared on February 22, 2016 by the above court with respect to the Busan District Court D distribution procedure case.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a company that engages in ordinary cargo transport business, and one of the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant”) is a cargo transport agent business, etc. The Defendant A is a person who operates a transport business with the trade name of “F”, Defendant B is a person who operates a transport business with the trade name of “G”, and Defendant C is a land owner of a warning and logistics company (hereinafter “aler”).
B. The Plaintiff received a ruling of provisional seizure against the warning logistics as follows.
1) On October 15, 2015, the Plaintiff is a quinabnb or Hegel Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “quinabnb”) of the warning logistics with the claim amounting to KRW 100 million by Busan District Court Decision 2015Kadan769 (hereinafter referred to as “Manbnb”).
(2) On November 6, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for provisional attachment with respect to the claims against E, and received the decision of provisional attachment on October 29, 2015. (2) On November 6, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for provisional attachment with respect to the claims against E, S, S, P, P, B, E, E, E, and E, P, P, E, E, P, E, E, and E, P, E, E, P, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, and E,
C. The Defendants and warning logistics prepared a notarial deed of the following contents (hereinafter collectively referred to as “notarial deed of this case”).
1) On October 26, 2015, Defendant A and warning logistics drafted an authentic deed of a debt repayment contract (quasi-loan for consumption) with the purport that they are liable to pay KRW 300,000 to Defendant A, a notary public H H office deed No. 1238 on October 26, 2015. (2) On October 30, 2015, Defendant A and warning logistics drafted an authentic deed of a debt repayment contract with the effect that the warning logistics is liable to pay KRW 19,5160,000 to Defendant A for transportation (quasi-loan for consumption).
3 Defendant B and warning logistics are the transport cost of Defendant B under No. 1274, Oct. 30, 2015, with the certificate of H office issued by a notary public H on October 30, 2015.