logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.10.19 2017가단13734
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On January 8, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the “B” agreement with the Defendant providing online information services (such as consulting, provision of information, etc. with respect to a tendering company) under the name of “B,” with which the Defendant will pay 2% of the successful bid price (hereinafter “instant agreement”) to the Defendant, instead of using the electronic bidding analysis consulting, and the successful bid price. (2) The Plaintiff did not submit an objection against the Plaintiff’s respective 32,10,913, 200, 200, 3616, 3716, 257, 206, 37, 47, 207, 207, 207, 3616, 47, 207, 365, 207, 207, 365, 206, 207, 365, 37, 2016, 206, 207, 36, 16, 37, etc.

2. The Plaintiff appears to have directly participated in the bid according to the instant agreement in appearance, but in fact, the Plaintiff appears to have determined the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim.

arrow