beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor on July 1, 2014, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged in the instant case on the ground that the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and acquitted the Defendant on the charge of the forgery and use of the F in the instant contract by entering the name F in the sexual name column in the lower order of the real estate consulting agreement (hereinafter “instant contract”) on July 1, 2014, by signing the name of F without authority.
2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the lower court’s duly adopted and investigated evidence, the lower court’s judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the facts charged of this case is justifiable, and it erred by misapprehending the facts as alleged by the prosecutor and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, as otherwise alleged by the prosecutor:
subsection (b) of this section.
(1) The defendant himself/herself entered the part of the main text of the instant contract (the location, area, and other matters of the land on which service is requested, and the part of the details of the request for service), the date of preparation, and the part of the address column in the table of the Service Personnel Act in
However, it is recognized that the part of each name of the client and service provider of the above contract, the whole part of the table of the client(the client) at the bottom, and the part of the above "service provider(the client)" in the table of the above "service provider(the client)" has not been entered, and it has not been known that anyone was entered.
On the other hand, the address and name of “H” in the above part of the client’s Schedule was stated as “H”, which is the agent of H, the client of the service (seller).
② As to whether the pen of "F" in the name of "F" in the table of "Service Personnel" at the bottom of the instant contract is identical to the pen of the part other than the table of "the client" in the said contract, and the National Scientific Investigation Institute shall mutually use the two parts.