beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and by a fine of three million won.
Defendant
B The above fine shall not be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. No person who processes personal information of Defendant B shall divulge personal information he/she becomes aware of in the course of performing his/her duties or provide such information to another person without authority;
On February 7, 2014, the Defendant was the director of the communication team in the E-company management support room, and on the request of the E-company E Company E, the work partner of the E-company, and from the present F Company E, there is no content of preparing an accelerator file in the business place since he/she was issued a business so far as he/she became aware of his/her business operation. What he/she could have been used as evidentiary data, the Defendant sent an accelerator file from the Defendant’s e-mail (H) around 10:34, Feb. 7, 2014, which is personal information, 22 affiliates of the E-company E company and 1,402 employees of the E-company E company and 22 affiliates of the E company, who were in possession of a separate storage after accessing the E-company E company, and sent an EX file in the name, office, telephone number, and mobile phone number from the Defendant’s e-mail (H) to A (I).
Accordingly, the Defendant, who managed personal information, divulged personal information without authority that became aware of in the course of performing his duties.
2. Defendant A
(a) No person who processes personal information in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act shall divulge personal information that he/she has become aware of in the course of performing his/her duties or provide such personal information to another person without authority, and no one shall knowingly receive such personal information for profit or for
The Defendant, from the early February 2014, was to be in charge of business affairs at the Incheon Branch of F Co., Ltd., the Defendant requested that B, an employee of the former E Co., Ltd., who was an employee of the E Co., Ltd., in accordance with paragraph 1, to access the E Co., Ltd.’s E Co., Ltd. to the E Co., Ltd., and then stored separately from the E Co., Ltd., and the department to which 1,402 employees of the G