logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.12.23 2014나3942
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

(b) :Around 25, in respect of the damage suffered by F from a motor vehicle accident caused by the E-vehicle at the entrance of the damaged part into the Dong-Eup in Jin-si in Jin-si, the F promises from the Plaintiff to give up all of its rights and not to raise a civil or criminal action or objection for any reason, and sign and seal on this Agreement as evidence;

(161,200,000 won (including 161,200,000) of the received amount, to receive the above agreed amount as a whole of the legal damages due to the above accident (including ex post facto disability, pin removal, sexual surgery expenses, etc.) and to conclude the accident.

b. The above agreed amount is the amount paid as a security for non-insured injury under excess liability insurance, and further additional operations, such as infination (including delay fination) and fination operation, except for fin removal from liability insurance, are required, if any, the operating expenses will be additionally paid * F will transfer to the plaintiff the right to claim damages against the perpetrator within the scope of the insurance proceeds paid from non-insured injury fination.

D. According to the above agreement, the Plaintiff paid F 161,20,000 won to F by July 23, 2013, and the remainder of the non-insurance premium, excluding the amount claimed as a liability insurance amount and a part of the said money, is KRW 62,939,020.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff acquired the right to indemnity against the Defendant and A, and the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with the Plaintiff to pay KRW 62,939,020 to the Plaintiff and its delay damages.

3. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The defendant's assertion stated that the defendant allowed G, a child of the defendant, to use the instant accident vehicle, but G lent the instant accident vehicle to another person.

arrow