1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s spouse’s deceased B (CB, hereinafter “the deceased”) worked as the backline from D Mining Offices to May 1, 1989, and from March 16, 1993 to September 18, 197, the Plaintiff’s spouse worked as the backline.

B. The details of the precise diagnosis of the deceased are as listed below.

on September 20, 200 to January 25, 1997, 200 or on September 20, 2000 to April 20, 200 to April 20, 200 to April 20, 200 to June 1, 1997, "Korea Hospital 2/10" on December 1, 200 to December 6, 1997, 2/199 " 2/1" on August 23, 201 to 20. 20 from August 5, 201 to October 10, 201 to 3, 200 to 4. 6/6. 7, 200 to 4. 2, 200 to 4,6. 2, 200 to 10. 2, 201 to 3, 201 to 16. 2, 200

C. On November 19, 2014, the Deceased died at the Taeburgic Care Center.

The body autopsy of the deceased is indicated as the direct death of the deceased, as the middle line, “debrisonment,” and “margument,” which are the preceding death.

The Plaintiff asserted that the deceased died from pneumoconiosis, which is an occupational disease, and a combination thereof, and claimed for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant. However, on September 24, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision on the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that the deceased’s death, which is the middle line of the deceased, appears to have been caused by stroke, stroke, heavy dementia, and electric shock, rather than the pneumoconiosis, on the ground that the deceased’s pneumoconiosis and death are low in relation thereto.

The plaintiff again pays bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the defendant.