The judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

The Defendants jointly do so and jointly against the Plaintiff B in the amount of KRW 4,000,000.

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. According to the first instance judgment, the Plaintiffs’ issues in the instant case are as follows. Specific expressions related to the content of the subject statement are as follows: (a) the Plaintiffs’ statement to the effect that the Plaintiffs are pro-North Korea personnel (hereinafter “pro-North Korea personnel statement”).

(1) ① Of the instant broadcast, the title “five North Korea husband and wife” and the part introducing the Plaintiffs as “three North Korea husband and wife” corresponding to “three” (B) , “pro-North Korea is essential. In other words, it is necessary to ignore the State’s identity, ignores the enemy country, praises North Korea, or praises North Korea, and, thereafter, it is possible to see the flag of the Republic of Korea, the flag of the Republic of Korea, the national flag of the Republic of Korea, and the flag of the Republic of Korea, and in the following manner, pro-North Korea, so that it is not immediately pro-North Korea. The name of the opening. If a person who is indicated as pro-North Korea is a counter-espionage, where the counter-espionage is a espionage agent, the part of the Defendant C’s remarks of the Defendant C, “The part of the Plaintiff’s 2, 1999, 199, 200, 300,000,000).

() The part of the Defendant C’s statement that “Is up to sweed up with sweed up, sweed up with sweed up, and 2.7 billion won,” with respect to the Plaintiff B, it is deemed that Plaintiff B thought B’s 6.25 War is protruding (hereinafter referred to as “victim caused by death”).

Defendant C may respond to the question of whether the 625 war among the radio broadcasts referred to in the "Radio Broadcastings B" is South or North invasion.

The answer.