logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.04.17 2013고단174
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A A Fines of 5,00,000 won, Defendant B of 1,000,000 won, and Defendant C of 600,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 01:40 on February 7, 2013, the Defendants drink the alcohol at the G main point in the management of the victim F (the age of 47) in Yasan City E, and Defendant B demanded the victim to deduct 1.50,000 won paid in excess of the above main point in the past from the drinking price, but the victim refused to do so, and the victim did so. The Defendant C was off the victim's face and her chest, who was on the chest, and was on the chest, was off the victim's face and her chest, and the victim's face was taken off, and the Defendant A was "I I I I I I I would am", and the victim's face was frighted from the victim's back to the victim, and the Defendant B was sick.

As a result, the Defendants jointly conducted an inspection on the parts and clothes requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of photographs, investigative reports, and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendants who choose to commit a crime;

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) Defendant A was punished several times for the same crime and committed the instant crime during the suspended execution period; (b) considering the fact that: (c) Defendant A was divided in depth into 60,000 won for the victim; and (d) Defendant B had the same power to pay 60,000 won to the victim; and (c) Defendant B had reached a mutual agreement with the victim, but the same kind of power is divided in depth; (d) the degree of damage is not significant; and (e) Defendant C was first committed and agreed with the victim.

arrow