1. The Plaintiff’s rehabilitation obligor A, the litigation taking over the Defendant Kyung-nam Corporation, shall be the administrator of Gyeong-nam Construction Corporation.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is an autonomous management body organized by the occupants to manage the 19-dong 903 households and affiliated facilities (hereinafter “the instant apartment complex”) located in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-do, 671, Pyeongtaek-do, 19-dong 671, and the association for the housing reconstruction project of the non-electric field 2 complex (hereinafter “non-party association”) is an implementer who newly built and sold the instant apartment complex. The rehabilitation procedure was commenced on May 14, 2015 with the Seoul Central District Court 2015 Ma10070, and the lawsuit was initiated by A who was appointed as the manager, regardless of whether before or after the rehabilitation was performed by the non-party association.

B. From November 13, 2009 to November 12, 2010, 769,687,512 from November 13, 201 to November 12, 2012, 209, the warranty period of the warranty contract is 1,154,531,2684, and the warranty period is 769,687,5123 from November 13, 201 to November 12, 201, and the warranty period is 1,154,531,2684 from November 13, 2009 to November 12, 201, and the warranty period is 57,265,634,534 from November 13, 201 to Defendant Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Defendant Mutual Aid Association”) issued the warranty period from each of the instant construction contracts to November 13, 2014.

Since then, the guarantee creditor of each guarantee contract of this case was changed to the plaintiff in the Pyeongtaek-si market.

C. The instant apartment was inspected on or around November 16, 2009, and the instant apartment was inspected on or around November 16, 2009, and the Defendant Gyeongnam Company failed to construct the instant apartment in accordance with the design drawing or constructed it differently from the defective construction or design drawing. 2) Accordingly, the Plaintiff from May 2010 to the point of view.