(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.01.06 2015가단680

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.01.06 2015가단680

물품대금

Text

1. As to the Plaintiff, Defendant E&M et al.:

(a) KRW 26,290,000 and this shall be from January 20, 2015.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim for construction cost at the end of the year

A. In full view of the facts without dispute, evidence Nos. 2 and 8-3 of evidence Nos. 8-3, the Plaintiff entered into a supply and construction contract with the Defendant Company and the entire purport of the pleadings, with regard to the contract amount of KRW 124,300,00 for the completion of construction works in the 1300,000 among the construction works in the 1-5 living zone in the 1-5 zone, L1BL apartment construction works in the 124,300,000 for the 10th of the following month, and for the delivery period from September 15, 2013 to November 3, 2013, and the Plaintiff completed the supply and construction works under the above contract, and the Defendant Company paid the Plaintiff KRW 10,00,000 out of the above contract amount.

Therefore, the Defendant Company is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of the contract amount of KRW 14,300,000 (=124,300,000 - 110,000,000) and delay damages.

B. The plaintiff alleged that he/she supplied and performed additional 14,850,000 won in relation to the above Sejong City Project, but it is not sufficient to recognize the above only by the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 6 and 7, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

2. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute over the claim for the construction cost of Daegu, and the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 7, and evidence Nos. 8-1, around October 22, 2013, the plaintiff entered into a supply and construction contract with the defendant company and the Daegu-si Porte Co., Ltd. by setting the supply and construction contract with the same content as on November 11, 2013, and the fact that the plaintiff paid KRW 38,500 out of the above contract amount to the plaintiff among the three-stage new construction works (construction works) in the three-stage indoor construction works (construction works) of the Daegu-si Espool apartment, the amount of KRW 5,00,000, a bill of exchange 10% from the following month following the payment terms, the delivery period from October 22, 2013 to November 30, 2013.

Therefore, it is necessary.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.06 2017가단210883

-수원지방법원 2021.01.14 2019가단559800

-광주지방법원순천지원 2015.04.03 2014가단13512

-서울동부지방법원 2020.06.05 2020나21086