logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.07.09 2019나105076
대여금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The grounds for this part of the facts are as stated in the part concerning “1. Basic Facts” in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the case where “the results of the fact inquiry about C” in Section 6 of the judgment of the first instance court is used as “the results of the fact inquiry about C by the court of first instance”. Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff borrowed money from the Plaintiff in the first way to pay necessary expenses for the instant construction work, or the Plaintiff concluded a delegation contract with the Defendant for the instant construction work on behalf of the Defendant. As such, the Defendant asserted to the effect that: (a) the Plaintiff did not first request the Plaintiff to pay the Plaintiff money for KRW 20,00,00 in advance payment of labor cost; (b) KRW 12,611,256 in advance payment of labor cost incurred by the Plaintiff in relation to the instant construction work from November 2, 2016 to February 2017; (c) KRW 5,793,030 in advance; and (d) KRW 10,646 in advance payment of expenses incurred by the Plaintiff; and (d) KRW 160 in advance payment of expenses incurred by the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff; and (d) KRW 10,560 in advance payment of expenses incurred by the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff; and (e) KRW 10,516 in advance payment of expenses incurred by the Plaintiff’s evidence No.

arrow