logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.01.24 2016가단211849
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 38,775,776 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 13, 2015 to January 24, 2018.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

B, around 18:00 on September 13, 2015, driving Otoba (hereinafter “Defendant Otoba”) and proceeding three-lane roads in front of the police school, as the D Otoba (hereinafter “Plaintiff Otoba”) level, from the Haba level to the Haba level, according to the D Otoba level. The Plaintiff was driving on the same line after Defendant Otoba (hereinafter “Plaintiff Oba”).

At the time, seven teams, including B and the Plaintiff, etc., are Oral Baba, and they go to Daejeon from Pyeongtaek-gun of Gangwon-do to Daejeon, which led to the death distance in front of the above police school, and the troupe vehicle in the troup was Defendant Oba.

On the other hand, the traffic island was set up, but the four-lane of the above four-lane road was the right side of the traffic island, and the third-lane was the straight-on line that passed the left side of the traffic island.

B After passing through the above traffic island, the Plaintiff was at a speed to make a right-hand turn to the right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with respect to Defendant Obane.

[Reasons for Recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) or video Nos. 1, Eul's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings, barring any special circumstances, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the accident of this case pursuant to Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and Article 724 (2) of the Commercial Act.

The defendant's assertion of immunity is judged by the accident of this case.

arrow