1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A, C, and D are jointly and severally liable, but Defendant D succeeds from Nonparty D E.

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in the attached Form (including the changed part); and

2. Grounds for recognition;

A. Judgment by service of demand against Defendant A and B (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. Judgment by deeming the confession of claim against Defendant C (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

C. Comprehensively taking account of each of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers) and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5 against the defendant D, the deceased F (hereinafter "the deceased") was obligated to repay the claims for reimbursement against the plaintiff, such as the annexed claim cause and each of the changed claim cause. As the deceased died on March 17, 2017, the defendant and non-party E, G (the withdrawal of lawsuit September 21, 2017) jointly succeeded to the deceased's obligations. However, the defendant and G renounced renounced inheritance (the Suwon District Court Decision 2017Ra955 decided July 5, 2017) and the non-party E's heir of the deceased's property was accepted, but the defendant and the defendant were able to jointly waive the claims for reimbursement of the deceased's claims within the scope of 1017Ga167 decided May 8, 2017, and the defendant could be found to have been able to have succeeded to the deceased's property from the Seoul District Court.