logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.12.12 2017고단3787
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and by a fine not exceeding 300,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and is engaged in driving duties of Batoba;

On June 30, 2017, the Defendant driven the above off-to-land bicycle license without obtaining a motor engine device bicycle license from 10:00, and proceeds from driving the front road D in Gwangju mine area in the direction of the head of Gwangju in the direction of the head of Gwangju, while making the right-hand turn into the vicinity of the private distance intersection.

At the same time, the victim F (n, 68 years old) driving is proceeding on the two-lanes of the above road. In such a case, the person engaged in the motor bicycle riding has a duty of care to make a safe round by accurately operating the steering gear and brakes through a thorough operation of the steering gear and brakes in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to make a right-hand at the first lane of the above road, and caused the victim to go beyond the ground with the part of the hand-on, which was attached to the backside of the Defendant’s driving.

Defendant 1 suffered approximately seven weeks of treatment to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, she was in the middle of the 1st page of the right, which requires approximately seven weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driven C otoba without obtaining a motor device bicycle license as above at the date and place specified in paragraph 1.

3. No owner of an automobile who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Loss shall operate an automobile not covered by mandatory insurance;

The defendant is the owner of Oralba, who is the owner of Oralba.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the motor bicycle which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.F.

arrow