1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 16, 2014, the Plaintiff leased the “E gas station” in Daejeon Seo-gu C and D (hereinafter “E gas station”). From April 16, 2014, the Plaintiff is a petroleum retailer operating from April 22, 2014.

B. On October 20, 2014, the Institute and the Daejeon District Police Agency (hereinafter “The Control Group”) jointly collected samples from the gas station in the instant case and conducted a quantitative inspection. As a result, it was confirmed that the Plaintiff exceeded 150 hours of 150 meters (075% of 20liters) during the 12 main abandonment (hereinafter “instant main abandonment”) and exceeded the 1525 hours of usage and exceeded the 1525 hours of usage.

C. On December 5, 2014, the Defendant was notified of the foregoing fact from the Daejeon Chungcheongnam Headquarters, and was notified by the Daejeon District Police Agency that the modification program of the amount of flow was discovered in the Jeju Daejeon Med, as a result of the analysis of the Jeju Med, on the Jeju Medial Police Agency.

(2) On October 20, 2014, the Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business (hereinafter “The Act”) provides that “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business (hereinafter “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business”) provides that “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business (hereinafter “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business”) shall apply to “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business” and “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business” shall apply to “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business” and “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business” shall apply to “The Act on the Protection of Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business”.

D. On December 5, 2014, the Defendant issued a prior notice of disposition (the notice of holding a hearing) with respect to the Plaintiff.

Business facilities for the purpose of selling less than the net quantity under Article 39 (1) 2 (outstanding the factory) and Article 39 (1) 3 of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act, which are administrative disposition of disposition regulations (violations) on the location of the representative of a trade name.