logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.12.05 2017고단4758
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant’s employee violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles at a construction work establishment located in Korea located at a point of 381km in Seoul, 15:23 on February 15, 2005, thereby violating the Defendant’s duties.

“.....”

In Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the legal provisions applicable to the facts charged, "where an agent, employee or other employee of a corporation commits an offense provided for in Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine provided for in the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation." The effect of "the portion of the fine provided for in the relevant Article shall be retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court Decision of 2010Hun-Ga decided on Oct. 28, 2010, and Article 47 (3) of the Constitutional Court Act.

Accordingly, the above facts charged constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow