logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.25 2016가단534152
기타(금전)
Text

1. As to the plaintiffs' KRW 50,000,000 and each of the above money, the defendant shall start from August 17, 2016, respectively.

Reasons

. The date of delivery of the above real estate shall be June 27, 2016.

Article 3 [Extinguishment of Restricted Real Rights, etc.] If a reason exists to restrict the exercise of ownership, such as mortgage, superficies, right of lease, etc. established on the above real estate or there is any unpaid tax and other charges, the seller shall remove the defects, burdens, etc. of such rights and transfer full ownership to the buyer by the date of

except in the rights and amounts agreed to succeed.

Article 6 [Non-performance of Obligations and Compensation for Damages] If a seller or buyer has any non-performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the other party shall notify in writing the person who has defaulted, and the contract may be rescinded.

In addition, the parties to the contract may claim damages from the other party due to the cancellation of the contract, and the contract deposit shall be considered as compensation for damages, unless otherwise agreed.

10. The seller can establish a provisional registration or a right to lease on a deposit basis after the loan execution by the date of the shortage of the purchase price (* the purchaser's consent and*).

12.Any person who fails to comply with the results of verification of the certificate of transfer household inspection shall file an application for cancellation.

3) Meanwhile, the confirmation and explanatory note of the object of the instant sales contract attached to the instant sales contract is a body in the part of the “act”, and is indicated as “the expansion of the use room of the second floor and the expansion of the balcony toward the third floor North Korean Peninsula.” 4) At the time of the instant sales contract, the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant that they would receive a loan when the remainder is paid due to insufficient sales price. The Defendant, even though it is not a lessee, did not actually cause hindrance to the Plaintiffs’ receiving a loan, was at the time of cancelling the details of the move-in report.

5 The Plaintiffs paid the Defendant the down payment of KRW 50,000,000 on the day of the instant sales contract.

(b).

arrow