Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

An operator of image data processing equipment shall not arbitrarily handle the image data processing equipment for any purpose other than the intended purpose of installation, shoot other locations, and use a recording function.

Nevertheless, the Defendant installed CCTV, which is operated by the senior citizens' community hall (village center) located at the Seocho-si, Macheon-si, Mancheon-si, Mancheon-si, 2017, inside the above senior citizens' community, and used the recording function of the video information processing device.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Each investigation report (the verification of the voice recording ofCCTV and the counter-investigation into persons in charge of CCTV sellers);

1. CCTV photographs installed by the person under consideration;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that there was no intention on the instant case, although CCTV was installed at the time and place of the CCTV storage (the CCTV was installed at the time and place of the ruling, but the CCTV did not have the function of recording.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, ① there was a conflict between the defendant's moving into a village and running a profit-making business, such as environmental business, in the above elderly community, and the defendant installed the CCTV in order to monitor the activities within the elderly, ② the defendant purchased and installed the CCTV through a person E, and ② it is reasonable to view that the defendant explained the use of CCTV from the distributor or E at the time of installation, ③ the defendant confirmed the CCTV video from E to E's cell phone.

The CCTV, other than visual images, appears to have been sound (in particular, considering that the CCTV in this case was intended to monitor the activities of other senior citizens in the context of senior citizens, it would be sufficient to attract them to listen to the voice, other than actions), and (4) there is a difference in the price of CCTV depending on the existence of CCTV recording function. The CCTV in this case is the money of the defendant via E.