The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 19, 2015, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the Defendant from suffering any other person, and to have the Defendant wear protective outfits, such as the pet dog, in the vicinity of the Daegu Bank, Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the Defendant from suffering any other person.

Nevertheless, by negligence, the defendant neglected this, caused the victim's bridge by asking the victim's bridge to the victim C (65 years) and suffered from the victim's resistance for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act.

On April 8, 2016, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victim may recognize the fact that he/she expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant in this court.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.