logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.12.09 2015고단4994
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 shall be confiscated by Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On February 18, 2013, the Busan District Court sentenced eight months of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Busan Detention House on July 26, 2013.

Defendant

A From February 23, 2015 to February 27, 2015 of the same month, the game site "I" on the first floor of H in Busan J, Busan, and Defendant B, as the chief of the day in the above game site, served as a management of the game site, such as fund management, settlement of customers' points, coophone payment, etc., and each of the three lines on the screen of the game machine is 20,000 points, if each of the three lines on the screen of the game machine was suspended, correspond to the foregoing, with a street or scoo line, it constitutes a prote current game where the 20,000 points are obtained. When the color of the number on the bottom of the forest coincides rapidly, the points are continuously obtained, and the number of customers obtained 50 points on the screen, which were installed in the game site, and provided 10,000 points and 100 points and 10,000 points on the screen of the game product management committee.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game products not classified by the Game Management Committee, and provided customers with a coophone corresponding to the game result, thereby promoting speculation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A (part) and B;

1. Statement of each prosecutorial statement against J and K;

1. Each written statement of L, M, N, andO;

1. Seizure records;

1. Return by the Game Industry Management Committee;

1. Previous conviction (Defendant B): The current status of personal and criminal records;

1. According to each evidence of the judgment on Defendant A’s assertion, the instant game product constitutes a “game product not permitted for use by juveniles,” and the “game product not permitted for use by juveniles” constitutes a “game product not permitted for use by juveniles.”

arrow