beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. The plaintiffs asserted as follows as the grounds of the instant claim.
Plaintiff
B, from January 2017 to the defendant's request, it was difficult to look at D with the evidence of the defendant's birth as the defendant's birth.
Plaintiff
B After completing a public performance by the Medical Care Center on March 25, 2017, B, after completing the public performance by the Medical Care Center, B, with E and F, was drunk and was under the influence of alcohol. However, as we find in the above singing room without D's sea and find the F's body and find the F's body and reject it, they should undergo G's apology regarding the attempted rape case on November 2016.
'B was shouldered by Plaintiff B, while Plaintiff D and Plaintiff B were on the one hand and demanded G to be subject to death, and Defendant B suffered an injury that is in need of six weeks’ treatment to G with Si expenses.
Plaintiff
B due to the above criminal case, it has suffered property damage such as expenditure of 10 million won as attorney appointment fee, deposit of 15 million won as damages for G with compensation for damage, and it has also been difficult to lead a normal social life with a person who has fallen before and after the death, and the de facto marriage relationship with the plaintiff A has also been broken down.
Plaintiff
A was living together with the plaintiff B while leading to marriage, but the above criminal case led to severe depression, and it was not notified to the family members of the wind that the plaintiff B became a criminal suspect.
Although the Defendant, as the only blood organ of D, has a legal obligation to protect D with mental illness, the Defendant had been sexually living together with the Defendant, and was in charge of hiding it and leaving D with the Plaintiff B, despite having been aware of the fact that D’s mental disorder or past history was caused by her sexually frightencing the Defendant, and had D intentionally avoided the obligation to protect D by allowing D to deposit D solely with the Plaintiff B, while being aware that D’s mental disorder or past history was caused by the foregoing accident.
D is detained in the above criminal case, and even after the release on January 23, 2018, in the vicinity of Plaintiff B.