beta
Text
Defendant
C All appeals against the Defendants by the Prosecutor and the Prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The sentence of Defendant C (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
B. The prosecutor’s each sentence of the lower court (three years of probation, probation, community service order 200 hours in January 1 and August, one year and four months of imprisonment, one year and four months of imprisonment, two years of probation, two years of the community service order under one year and four months of imprisonment, three years of probation under one year and eight years of imprisonment, three years of the probation under one year and eight months of imprisonment, and two hours of the community service order under one year and eight: one year and eight months of the probation, and two hundred hours of the community service order under one year and eight)
2. Determination
A. According to the records, the court below decided that the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) was attempted, since the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the process and method of the crime, there are several records of punishment for the defendant A as well as the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) in the case of the defendant A and the defendant C; the crime of this case was committed again during the repeated crime period; the defendant C and the defendant E committed the crime of this case; the crime of this case was committed by the defendant B and the defendant E; the mistake was divided in the case of the defendant C; the other defendants are divided, against each other; the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint conflict) was committed; the defendant A, the defendant B and the defendant C agreed with M in the case of the defendant; the victim does not want the punishment for the defendants; the victim's Ha does not want to be punished for the same kind of crime; the defendant Eul and the defendant D did not have any specific record of punishment for the defendant's punishment.
B. There is no particular change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment as the new sentencing data has not been submitted in the trial court, and Defendant C has committed any error in the trial.