A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal history] On March 15, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud, etc. on August 15, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 23th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. On May 21, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents in the column of “a summary of the removed service contract” by using the D D process Korean program in the office of the Dispute Settlement Bank Co., Ltd., which is located in W in Whddddong-si, and entered “A” in the “a summary of the removed service contract” column: D parcel, the total area of removal: 20,000 square meters (6,050 square meters) in Jung-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the service contract amount: Additional tax separate, the amount of KRW 1,30,000,000 per day (Won 1,30,000,000): May 21, 2015 to December 30, 2015; and “A” column of “A: One asset and address: the trust in Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the name and address of the trust in advance, and the name and address of the trust in E, after which the trust was sealed.”

Accordingly, the defendant has forged one copy of the removal service contract in the name of one asset trust company, which is a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising.

2. On June 12, 2015, the Defendant, at the G Certified Judicial Scriveners Office located in Seoul FF around June 12, 2015, shown that the document was a document duly formed with the completion of a forged removal service contract.

Accordingly, the defendant held a copy of a contract for removal service of forged private documents.

3. Around June 12, 2015, the fraud Defendant displayed a forged contract for the removal of services with the victim H as above at the said G A certified judicial scrivener office, and falsely concluded that “In order to perform the removal works, it is necessary to pay operating expenses, and if 100 million won is leased, she would allow the victim to participate in the work of removing services with the I operated by the victim as a part of the removal works.”

However, the above removal service contract is forged, and it has entered into a contract for the removal work with one asset trust company in charge of the management of the defendant.