Defendant

A and C shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, by imprisonment for ten months, and by imprisonment for one year and six months, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A serving as the president of the school juristic person N in Lin-si, who established and operated Lin-si, from 190 to 190, manages the administrative affairs on behalf of the school juristic person N., and Defendant B served as an associate professor or the president of lifelong education after being appointed as the assistant professor of M in the above university from August 1, 1989 to February 28, 2009, and was in charge of the administrative affairs on behalf of the above university. Defendant C is a father of the above university and was in charge of the administrative affairs on behalf of the above university. Defendant C is an assistant professor or the associate professor after being appointed as a full-time lecturer at M in-si around March 1, 1989 and served as the president of the above university from March 1, 2005 to August 20, 2009. In particular, Defendant A’s father’s work as the president of the above university and assist in the affairs of Defendant B, the principal of the school juristic person, the president of the school juristic person, who exercised the forfeited rights.

In September 2005, the MM University (hereinafter “the instant construction”) ordered the new construction of the Child Education and Welfare Center (hereinafter “the instant construction”) to select the construction company by giving a public notice of bidding. Defendant B, the dean of the MM college, and Defendant C, the vice president of the university, had the duty to select the construction company through fair procedures through open competitive bidding in performing the relevant affairs such as the selection of the construction company and the order.

1. Defendant A, B, and C’s joint criminal conduct of breach of trust is proposed that Defendant B may undertake the instant construction work with the knowledge of the company that was appropriate for ordering the instant construction work from August 1, 2005 and that D may undertake the said construction work with the premise that the P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “P”) was the supervising company of theO it operated by the P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “P”), and that P would undertake the said new construction work. Defendant B refers to Defendant C, and Defendant C refers to Defendant C.