logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.10.10 2019고단2321
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The name-free person is a person who recruits the representative of the old-age juristic person as a "book Distribution System", and performs the role of distributing the old-age juristic person's general expenditure support, such as expenses for the establishment of the old-age juristic person, and the defendant is a person who has the above name-free person, and the defendant is a person who has the above name-free person to establish a old-age juristic person by providing all documents necessary for the establishment of the juristic person to the above name-free person and by opening the account to sell it to the above name-free person.

1. On January 2018, the Defendant provided all documents, such as a certified copy of resident registration, to the Defendant necessary for the establishment of a corporation, in accordance with the proposal made by the person without the above name, to the person with poor name. On or around the 23th day of the same month, the above person with poor name was the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-ro, the fact in the registry of the Seoul Central District Court was the intention to sell the means of access after opening an account by establishing a floating corporation. In fact, the person with poor name applied for the establishment of a corporation without any intention to establish and operate the corporation. In fact, the public official without knowledge of the fact entered the computer into the commercial registry to complete the registration of incorporation B (C and the representative director) in the commercial registry, and kept the above computerized corporate register with the record of the error recorded.

In collusion with the above, the Defendant, from that time to March 20, 2018, filed a false report with respect to the public official in the same manner three times, such as the statement in the list of crimes (1) in the attached Table, and had the public official record the false facts in the electronic records in the same electronic records as the original notarial deed and exercised it.

2. Around February 7, 2018, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act opened a bank account in the name of “B” corporation, an old-age corporation established as above, with the said account opened around that time.

arrow