A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

At around 15:00 on August 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) provided the victim’s bath at the D cafeteria located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, as well as E (n, 48 years of age) and F, and (b) provided the victim’s bath. The victim’s refusal to do so was the victim’s disease, which is a dangerous object in front of the Defendant: (a) the victim’s head was defective; (b) the victim’s refusal was the victim’s injury, such as cerebrin, where there was a head open room for two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see the following reasons for sentencing) for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of conviction and sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., did not inflict an injury upon the victim’s head due to beer, and denies the charges.

그러나, 앞서 설시한 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 점, 즉 ① 피고인의 수사기관 및 법정에서의 진술과 앞서 든 증거들을 종합하여 보면, 이 사건 당시 정황상 피해자의 상처는 피고인이 가해 또는 피해자의 자해가 원인이 되었을 것으로 보이고, 그 외 다른 원인이 개입되었을 가능성은 적은 것으로 보이는 점, ② 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 이 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 피고인이 맥주병으로 피해자의 머리를 때려서 상해를 입었다고 진술하는 점, ③ 피고인은 당시 피해자와 고스톱치기를 그만 두고 TV를 보고 있었는데, 갑자기 퍽 소리가 났고, 피해자가 맥주병을 들고 있었으며, 머리에서 피가 났다고 진술한다.

However, it is true.