logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.13 2018나36174
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. On December 9, 2017, around 07:58, the Plaintiff filed a claim for reimbursement related to a traffic accident (see attached Form No. 1; hereinafter “instant accident”). 2. The instant accident conflicts between the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “loan” in the attached Form No. 1) and the left-hand turn at the normal left-hand turn on the two-lanes where the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “self-employed vehicle” in the attached Form No. 1) is able to turn to the left-hand turn with the straight line and the left-hand turn on the left-hand turn, while the Defendant’s vehicle normally turn to the left-hand turn at the same lane, the left-hand turn-hand turn of the Defendant vehicle.

(A) As above, there is no evidence to acknowledge the Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s vehicle would go as soon as the Plaintiff’s vehicle would go straight and turn to the left, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle normally turn to the left according to the guiding line would not have any other way to avoid different Defendant vehicles, which conflict with the rear side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle because the Plaintiff’s vehicle was left to the left, from the first lane to the second lane, the left left to the left, and even if the vehicle turns to the second lane, it seems that there was no other way to avoid the Defendant’s fault. (It seems that there was no other way to avoid the Defendant’s vehicle, the Plaintiff’s vehicle would not go to the left and turn to the second lane.)

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit.

arrow