logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.16 2017고단1743
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 5270] Defendant A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on May 23, 2013 and completed the execution of the sentence on November 25, 2013.

1. On April 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel D, for the victim E, “There are several inner systems, and KRW 10 million and KRW 5 million.”

There is a guidance, and the false statement was made to the effect that the payment of the guidance was to be made on the fixed date when the payment was made.

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the fraternity on the date of promise, even if he received the fraternity from the injured party, because he did not pay the fraternity properly, received the fraternity from the fraternity members, and lent it to another person, and operated the system by the method of prompt recovery, such as the failure to recover it, and it was difficult to recover it, etc.

As above, the defendant deceiving the above victim and caused the victim to do so ten million won.

After having to join the 1.5 unit of the Gu, 201.4.20 on April 20, 2016; May 5, 2016; May 2016; May 5, 2016; June 5, 2016; June 20, 2016; June 20, 2016; July 20, 2016; July 20, 2016; and August 5, 2016; and acquired KRW 5,280,000 in total by obtaining KRW 660,000 each installment payment on eight occasions.

2. On July 6, 2016, at the place indicated in paragraph 1, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “When investing KRW 10 million in merchandise coupons, 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, would be included in merchandise coupons, and KRW 11 million, including interest at KRW 10,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, would be returned to the Defendant.”

However, since the defendant operated the system by preventing the prompt return as described in paragraph 1, even if he receives money from the injured party, it is used to pay the money to the other members of the community.

arrow