Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3.5 million.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant A, on November 2010, employed juvenile He(s) at G dan dan, a business establishment harmful to the Defendant’s management, a business establishment harmful to the Defendant’s management of the Defendant F of Gwangju Mine-gu, as a entertainment loan with the amount of KRW 30,00 per hour.

2. Defendant B, on December 2010, in the middle and lower order, employed the above K, a juvenile, at the J, a business establishment harmful to the Defendant’s management, Gwangju Mine-gu I, the said Defendant, as a business establishment harmful to the Defendant’s management, with the amount of KRW 30,00 per hour and as a entertainment loan.

3. Defendant C

A. On December 2010, the above Defendant violated the Juvenile Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Juvenile Protection Act”) employed a juvenile as a contact with the Defendant at a singing practice room, which is a business establishment harmful to the Defendant’s management of the Defendant in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, while giving 30,000 won per hour.

B. The above defendant violated the Music Industry Promotion Act.

In the same time as paragraph, alcoholic beverages such as beer have been sold to unspecified customers at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Determination as to the Defendants’ assertion on each legal statement of H, K, N, andO

1. Although the defendant A did not recognize the crime, the above defendant was found to have committed the crime in light of the fact that H was employed by the police investigation process and the first trial date of this case at the first trial of the above defendant, it is sufficiently recognized that the above defendant committed the crime in light of the following: "O's legal statement, 135 pages, and 461 et al. of the investigation record at the time" in this court stated clearly that "I would not use the forged identification card at the time, and if I would be said that I will not use the falsified identification card at the time, and even if I would request a suspicion identification card, I would be said that I will be the reported broadcast room operator

2. Although the above defendant B did not recognize the criminal facts, K was clearly employed by the above defendant's business establishment in this court and even stated that the above defendant's face at the time is clearly memory, the above defendant's crime is committed.