logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.10.16 2019나41345
보증채무금반환 청구의소
Text

The judgment of the first instance court is modified as follows. A.

The Defendants are from each network D (Death on April 3, 2016) to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case are as follows: the Defendant’s joint and several liability for the unpaid construction cost within the scope of the property division claim inherited from the deceased, “The Defendant succeeded to the Defendant’s joint and several liability for the unpaid construction cost, so the Defendants, within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased, did not appear as the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, even if the result of the document appraisal by the appraiser N of the court of first instance appears as the reason for the judgment, on the ground that the document appraisal by the Defendant did not appear as follows: “The Defendant succeeded to the Defendant’s joint and several liability for the unpaid construction cost, within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair with some different conclusions, it is partially accepted the defendants' appeal and it is modified as ordered by the judgment of the court of first instance.

arrow