logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.10.02 2015고정490
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant works as an instructor of a private teaching institute at the CAH located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, and is engaged in driving of DPP motor vehicles.

On December 24, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, around 19:10 on December 24, 2014, proceeded straightly at the speed of the US, along the four-lanes in the direction of the terminal in the direction of the distance of the terminal.

In such a case, when a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has always followed the behind of the motor vehicle in a clear mental condition, he/she has a duty of care to secure a sufficient distance to avoid collisions with the motor vehicle and safely proceed with it, to prevent the accident, despite the fact that the defendant has a duty of care to prevent the accident, he/she is under the influence of alcohol with the blood alcohol concentration of 0.075%;

In order to observe the above signal, the FSP car driven by the victim E (V, the age of 41) was shocked into the front part of the vehicle being stopped.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim in need of treatment for about two weeks due to salt panions, etc., and damaged the damaged vehicle's repair cost amounting to KRW 901,250.

B. The Defendant who caused the above traffic accident in violation of the Road Traffic Act (In the event of an accident) immediately left the vehicle after stopping and took necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim. However, the Defendant driven the vehicle without any measure and escaped to the place of the vehicle.

C. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (A) driving the above spectrum vehicle at the section of about 10 km from the front side of the restaurant, in which it is impossible to know the trade name in the Yanannam-dong, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.075% of blood alcohol concentration at the same time as the above paragraph (a) of the same Article, from the front side of the restaurant in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in the Dongan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seo

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow