Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. In the order of a person’s instructions to take actions against his or her nameless telephone inducement, cash collection, collection books, and other measures, the scam’s scam scam scam, which led the victim’s telephone number that he or she became aware of by an influence to receive money from another person by misrepresenting the phone number of the victims to transfer money.

The Defendant, in collusion with an instruction of his name-free behavior (one name “C”), led to the Defendant to play a role of receiving damages by deceiving the victim and misrepresenting the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service.

On March 6, 2018, in accordance with the above public offering details, a personal account will be created if the victim D calls on March 14:10, 2018, and the victim himself/herself is a public prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office. "If the passbook was created in the name of the party, the passbook was used for the fraud crime, and the account information was disclosed to the criminal, and if all the money in the passbook was disclosed to the criminal, it will be deposited in the virtual account.

‘Falsely speaking, the place where the victim and the day were set.’

On the other hand, the above instructions on the non-name behavior (C) notified the Defendant of the victim and the method of receiving money at “E”, which is a mobile Internet service, and accordingly, the Defendant, at around 16:40 on the same day, was given the victim a cash of KRW 10 million from the victim as the Defendant was a employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and was given a cash of KRW 520,000,000 to the account designated by the above instructions on the behavior.

Accordingly, the Defendant received property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the employees of the above singishing operations.

B. The Defendant forged official document at around 09:00 on the same day, output the documents of the Financial Supervisory Service to commit the phishing crime from the books of non-act behavior (i.e., the name “C”).