A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

From September 28, 2013 to November 28, 2013, the Defendant was engaged in rental car business and agreed to lend a sum of KRW 1,2250,000,000,000,000 owned by the injured party D (representative E) in the office of the rental car located in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, to pay KRW 1,2250,000,000,000,000,000,000 in the market price of HM5 car, and KRW 1,495,00,000,000,000,000, and KRW 1,175,000,000,000 for each car, and KRW 528,2250,00,000 to the injured party, respectively.

As above, while the Defendant borrowed five sirens from the victim, from around October 16, 2013 to around December 2013, the Defendant borrowed a sum of KRW 348 million from K on five occasions, offered the said sirens as security without permission and embezzled it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement to K and E;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (for the price of a damaged vehicle);

1. Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act, comprehensively including applicable provisions of the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment, the scope of the recommended sentence on the grounds of sentencing sentencing for the sentencing of imprisonment with prison labor [the scope of punishment for embezzlement and breach of trust, Type 1 (less than KRW 100 million), the basic area, period of imprisonment with prison labor from April to April], and the following circumstances, shall be determined as per the disposition in consideration of all the following circumstances. favorable circumstances: (a) the amount of embezzlement is minimal; (b) the amount of embezzlement is not sufficient; and (c) the amount of damage is not repaid; and (d) other unfavorable circumstances are determined as per the disposition for reasons above, such as motive, background