logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.06.14 2017고단1373
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2017. 3. 27. 01:37 경 대전 서구 대덕대로 189에 있는 수협은행 둔 산 지점 앞길에서 술에 취하여 그곳에 있던 택시의 문짝을 걷어차는 등의 행동을 한 것으로 택시기사와 시비하던 중 112 신고를 받고 출동한 대전 둔 산 경찰서 C 지구대 소속 경찰관인 D로부터 귀가할 것을 권유 받자, 갑자기 D를 향해 가운데 손가락을 들어올리는 시늉을 해 보이면서 손으로 동인의 목과 가슴 부위를 수회 밀치고, 이를 말리는 같은 지구대 소속 경찰관인 E의 가슴 부위를 주먹으로 때리고, 손으로 동인의 허리를 붙잡고 다리를 걸어 넘어뜨리려는 행동을 하였다.

At around 02:07 on the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the act of assaulting police officers, etc. on the same day, and the Defendant expressed to the above E that E was “a dog” during the patrol team, which was going to go on as the C district, and spited the flab by spiting the flab of the F, which was a police officer of the same district, toward the face of the brue, and flabing the flab by spiting the flab of the F.

The Defendant assaulted police officers, such as D, and obstructed the legitimate execution of official duties concerning criminal investigations and maintenance of order.

2. At around 01:40 on the same day, the Defendant committed assault against the victim, such as the victim G (25 years) where the police officers were satisfing a plaque, and the Defendant was satisfing, as described in paragraph (1) of the aforesaid Article, on the ground that the Defendant was satisfing the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made with respect to E, D, and F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.

arrow