A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 5, 2020, at around 00:40, the Defendant assaulted, and obstructed E’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the handling of the report in the case of 112 cases, such as assaulting the employees of the above age clubs, etc., to E officers belonging to the police station D branch of the police station, who was called upon 112 reported by the Defendant, and the Defendant was asked to check the E officers belonging to the police officer belonging to the police station D branch of the police station, who was called.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTV video recording data in each police statement made to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. According to the reasoning for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the type of punishment exercised by the defendant and the degree of interference with the performance of official duties by the defendant, the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the defendant has no record of punishment, all of the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, career, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines set forth in the sentencing guidelines (basic area, imprisonment with prison labor from June to June) shall be set as the order.